The digital disorder chair at Essec Business School launched the first digital disorder matrix 2025, setting the effect of six main technologies in 11 main sectors.
Main technologies estimated
Digital disorder 2025 AI analyzes links, artificial intelligence, quantum computing, Blockchain, robots and automation, renewable energy and storage. These technologies were measured due to their capabilities to disable them using a complex registration system, derived from the size and trends of academic publications, patent files, categories, and inputs from industry professionals.
Trucific artificial intelligence has emerged as the most sabotage technology in the study, and has obtained a degree of disruption of 89.45 out of 100. This result was almost twice the most destructive technology, AI descriptive, which recorded 49.04. Follow and stored with renewable energy with 40.42, while quantum computing, robots and automation achieved 32.47 and 19.63, respectively. Although focusing on previous industry speculation has obtained 12.04 degrees, which reflects the effect in the real world for expectations.
Trends and contradictions across sectors
Research indicates unprecedented growth rates of publications related to artificial intelligence over the past five years, which exceeds the increase in Blockchain literature during the peak of the Covering currency 2021.
Despite the attention of the lower media, artificial intelligence – the formation of traditional machine learning, statistical analysis, and identification of patterns – raises constituent in commercial processes and forms the backbone of various emerging technologies.
The role of artificial intelligence was also noted in reducing cost barriers in front of robots. By enabling the creation of artificial training environments, artificial intelligence greatly reduces the costs of operating entry associated with spreading robots and automation.
The results of the sector include doubts in the car sector regarding the fork, with 22.7 % of opinions registered as negative. The luxurious sector showed mixed responses to the Wooing IQ Agency, while identifying it as a very positive and negative in its sabotage capabilities, but with the minimum neutral perspective between professionals.
Real estate specialists showed a remarkable enthusiasm for renewable energy, which leads to 91.1 % of positive opinions, a number that exceeds even the allocated energy sector itself.
Quantitative computing remains a field of uncertainty, ranging between 30 to 43 % of professionals in various industries that express neutral feelings – a reference to continuous questions about how to prepare for their final impact.
Restrictions and opportunities
The study defined energy storage restrictions as the basic bottleneck for technological innovation, as Moore’s law was replaced as the main restriction in the pace of transformation. The increasing demand for energy from emerging technologies highlights the necessity of applying for energy infrastructure as a prerequisite for the extension of digital solutions on a large scale.
“The goal of this annual scale is to understand the effect of each technology specifically, while ensuring the comparison between it and from year to year. The matrix provides us with an objective reference framework for tracking the development of technological disorders over time,” says Jean Underus, professor of information systems at ESCEC.
The ongoing smart nation initiative in Singapore, which includes large investments from both public and private sectors, provides a background for study. The matrix aims to direct policy makers and business leaders towards infrastructure priorities, taking into account both the promise and challenges that come with the rapid digital transformation.
Beyond noise analysis
“The paradox revealed by our study is that, despite the amazing penetration of the intrusive artificial intelligence, it has not yet reached the impact of renewable technologies, and both remain far from the levels of the implementation of traditional artificial intelligence. Analysis of sizes, trends and effects allows us to put excitement in the media about some technologies.”
The digital disorder matrix is not only classified as the technologies for the possibilities of disruption, but also dissecting the positions of the sector and adoption patterns. The analysis depends on more than 300 global publications, scientific articles, patents, and views of 1000 professional around the world, in addition to visions collected from 20 hours of interviews with 15 sector experts.
“By combining the analysis of extensive scientific data, it is rarely studied together, and the views of professionals in this field, we offer an objective maps fee for technological transformations. Our ambition is to retreat from directions and cancel the polarization about the discussion on this topic, it will be directed to the allocation that will lead to the allocation that will lead to the allocation that will affect it. Jeremy Bovils explains , Essec, CEO of the Essec Digital Disorder.
Digital disorder matrix will serve as an annual standard to monitor the development of technology impact on different sectors, focusing on a comparative data -backed analysis on an annual basis.
