ethereum Co -founder Vitalik Buterin And toni wahrstätem, researcher in Ethereum FoundationAnd put a an offer This will lead to the maximum gas you can use. The proposal, EIP 7983, claims:
“By implementing this limit, Ethereum can enhance its flexibility against some DOS [Denial of Service attack] Vocabulary, improving network stability, and providing more ability to predict the costs of processing transactions. “
The latest suggestion is a modified version of EIP 7825And, which was presented in November last year but has been stagnant since then.
The proposal will limit the use of gas for individual transactions to 16.77 million gas
The proposal aims to impose the maximum of 16.77 million gas for any one transaction, approximately half of the maximum gas limit of 30 million proposal in EIP 7825. This limit, according to Burin and Wahrstätem, will be applied regardless of the limit of mass gas determined by miners or auditors.
The implementation of this proposal will witness transactions that determine the gas limit of more than 16.77 million gas that is nullified. This means that while verifying the authenticity of transactions, transactions that exceed the gas limit and exclude them from the transactions gathering will be rejected. Likewise, while checking the health of the mass, any mass containing treatment that exceeds the specified gas limit will become invalid.
The BUTERIN and Wahrstätem gas reducing 16.77 million gas will provide a “balance between allowing complex transactions while maintaining the expected limits of implementation”, according to the proposal. The authors added:
“This value provides most currently use cases, including decades and advanced DEFI reactions, while ensuring consistent performance properties.”
When implementing, the proposal from users and decentralized applications (DAPS) will require the division of transactions with a higher gas border into smaller operations. However, the Buterin and Wahstätem expects that the limit will affect the minimum users and DAPPS because most current transactions are much lower than the proposed limit.
Why determining the limit of the treatment of treatment is important
The current ETHEREUM structure provides transactions to theoretically consuming the maximum gas of the mass. This architecture carries several risks.
For example, allowing one treatment to consume most or every limit of mass gas can make it easier for the miscarriages to carry out DOS attacks. In DOS attacks, bad actors try to overcome a network through a barrage of random mail transactions. This leads to the failure of the network to provide service to the original users.
According to the proposal, the absence of a transaction gas limit can also lead to an unequal distribution of pregnancy and affects the stability of the network.
The use of variable gas can also balance the distribution of pregnancy through transactions in a block. Moreover, high gas transactions also cause check -up times, which can affect the user experience.
Benefits to determine the limit of the transaction gas
According to Buterin and Wahrstäter, limiting the use of gas use of individual transactions can help reduce the risk of single DOS attacks. Basically, the maximum will set the handrail that prevents harmful actors from using the network frequency of the network through large random mail transactions.
The maximum will also guarantee the allocation of gas fairly through transactions in a block, as stated by the proposal. The cap is also expected to check the health of the blocks “more predictable and united”.
However, the most important benefit is to comply with zero knowledge (ZKVMS). Encouraging transactions with huge gas borders that are divided into smaller parts “allowing better participation in distributor proof systems”, enabling “more predictable ZKVM
