The Congress member in Ohio Thadius Clegit has officially submitted a draft law prohibiting the personality of artificial intelligence. In some situations, companies can legalize as people already, so this bill is not necessarily related to AGI.
The Claggett invoice describes a number of restrictions: LLM protocols cannot own property, direct human employees, be responsible for a crime, and more. The “sound sense” regulations can significantly affect corporate policies.
Sponsored
Sponsored
Can Amnesty International achieve personality?
Artificial general intelligence, or AGI, is Long -term goal In the industrial intelligence industry in the United States. Many LLM developers really believe that these models can achieve a real feeling, and they have become a functional independent intelligence.
Whether it is possible that artificial intelligence can reach a personality like this or not, one of the legislators in Ohio state is trying to anticipate the discussion with a new bill:
The new draft law, which was submitted in Ohio yesterday, will announce the law of “non -ruling” law.
HB469 is prohibited from granting any Amnesty International as a “legal personality”, or considering it awareness under the law.
The field of the wonderful law that develops behind the scenes pic.twitter.com/aldkzglkb
Julian Driver (@Julian __ driver) September 24, 2025
if HB 469Presented by Thaddeus Claggett, passing, artificial intelligence protocols cannot achieve a legal figure in Ohio.
This restriction will not only relate to AGI; In the United States, some companies Legally Count as people for some job functions. The Claggett bill takes the target of many of these.
Sponsored
Sponsored
For example, this draft law will prohibit the LLM program to become “any officer, manager or manager” for humans in any workplace or other organization. Amnesty International has not been able to legally or control any property independently, even if there are content created from artificial intelligence.
If the protocol violates directly or indirectly the law, then a person must bear a criminal responsibility. In other words, the restrictions of these artificial intelligence personnel would prove important precedents decisively for this growing industry.
After all, if a self -driving car passes over a pedestrian, it is not possible to judge a car to prison. Either the program developers or other company representatives need to take responsibility.
Long -term effects: a new legal field?
This artificial intelligence bill is especially interesting because Claggett is Republican. Under Trump’s presidency, the Republican Party has become a strongly supportive party, however Some cracks appeared In this position.
It is not fair to name this bill “Anti-Ei”, but however, the industry in general All the organization opposes. This may cause some friction.
It is not currently clear whether this draft law of artificial intelligence will win wider support. Even if it becomes a law, the effort is only related to the American state. However, these are decisive “healthy sense” measures.
Claggett’s efforts here can be the basis of future artificial intelligence organization throughout the country. If the development of artificial intelligence will be The main corner of today’s economyThen we need to answer a lot of questions. A new field of legal theory is developed, and we have an opportunity to influence it.