Can DePINs offer a ‘lower barrier to entry’ than stablecoins?

Can DePINs offer a 'lower barrier to entry' than stablecoins?

Table of Contents

This is an excerpt from the Empire Bulletin. To read the full editions, Subscribe.


It’s been a long time since we last talked about DePINs. Blockworks Research Analyst Nick Carpenito gives us the perfect excuse to dig back in after posting a note that’s not just focused on He dependsbut it looks specifically at Token power plants. And yes, it is more exciting than it seems at first glance.

Carpenito told me he felt compelled to research the topic because of this artificial intelligence.

“One of the important elements of AI today is that you see that the sector as a whole, outside of the decentralized part, is facing some serious energy constraints, especially outside the United States, but even in the United States,” he explained. So he dug deep to see how applicable it was.

In short, “projects that reliably link infrastructure performance to real-world revenues, address policy fragmentation, and maintain grid quality will be well positioned to shape the next generation of energy markets.”

But if this is the first time you’ve heard about these types of PINs, you’re not alone. I asked Carpenito about this, and he explained that wireless tends to be one of the most popular sub-sectors within DePIN – which is… He does track with What we’ve previously covered in Empire.

“There has been very little innovation in energy,” he said. It will take some time to see “meaningful range,” but Carpenito isn’t too worried about that.

In fact, his heated view is that some projects could start operating as “parts in the network” next year.

The theory I’ve been working on is a successful use case for DePINs. RWAs Stablecoins have seen great success, and DePINs follow a somewhat similar model. You’re taking a non-crypto industry and putting it on the paths of crypto, not only to improve it, but to open doors for non-crypto people to join the chain. Sounds like it matches the recipe for success we’ve seen, doesn’t it?

Admittedly, the reality is a bit more complex.

“If a DePIN project is successful when presented to a client, they should not call themselves DePIN. The benefits of the product should be clear, both from a cost and from a performance standpoint. Projects that succeed in this…are able to position themselves as valuable real-world utilities.” [that don’t] There is a very high barrier to entry,” Carpenito explained.

In many ways, “it’s very similar to stablecoinsand probably represents a lower barrier to entry than most stablecoins for the end customer. The other element of that is – and this is probably one of the things that attracted me to DePINs in the early days – it’s compelling, and I really think it is [opens up] The narrative is that everyone needs to buy their first token.

Now, we just need to attract more non-code natives to the chain.


Get news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters: