& Nbsp & nbsp
Craig WrightThe Australian computer world, which is claiming to be Satoshi Nakamoto, was fined 225,000 pounds by the London Court for incorrect use of artificial intelligence while trying to appeal a previous ruling from the Supreme Court that it is not Satoshi Nakamoto.
In March 2024, a London court ruled that Wright was not Satoshi and that he had lied widely during the trial. It was also prevented from setting any other legal issues against the encryption industry.
Cuba (open patent coalition for encryption) and other bitcoin groups defended the court, and asked the Court of Appeal to see its legal costs.
On Thursday, Lord Arnold Wright ordered the payment of 100,000 pounds to cover the costs of Cuba and 125,000 pounds for the costs of other encryption developers as a result of this case.
The judge argued that the fines were appropriate because the appeal of Wright was lacking in merit. Wright used artificial intelligence models to form his attractiveness. As a result of excessive use of artificial intelligence, his writings were complicated, and sometimes, they have no connection with the subject of the current issue. It is still in its cradle with regard to legal defense, the artificial intelligence model uses the precedents of the Jurit appeal.
& nbspLord Judge Arnold rejected the Wright case in the Court of Appeal. Wright tried to appeal the Supreme Court ruling last year that Wright was not the Creator of Bitcoin. Arnold rejected the Wright case because it was unnecessarily complicated and proportional to the case, in the risk of the court misleading with unnecessary information.
In December 2024, Wright was sentenced to 12 months in prison for the court’s contempt for issuing a new demand of 900 billion pounds related to Bitcoin, although the court prevented him from submitting any other cases. Lord Ernold presided over this case as well.
The Court of Appeal on Thursday may be the first case in which a person is requested to pay costs due to his misuse of artificial intelligence (AI).
Cuba asked the court to issue a civil arrest (CRO) against Wright, to prevent him from establishing court cases for a period of 3 years.
Jonathan Hug Ki, who represents Cuba, says if I saw the use of the legal system to “intimidate” his imagined enemies. HoG also requested that the prosecutor expand the appointment order from 3 years to a longer period.
“First, Dr. Wright brought a large number of baseless legal procedures,” Hug wrote, “Founded on lies and supports them with abundant fraud.”
Second, in those measures, he claimed huge sums against a large number of individuals and companies, causing serious distress, inconvenience and cost. “
“Third, his actions have taken very important court resources, reaching nearly 100 days in court in this judicial jurisdiction.”
“The undisputed result of his allegations was a great disruption in innovation in an important industry. There is a clear and dangerous danger to repeat his campaign of litigation in one way or another.”
Phil Sherry, Bird and Bird, said Cuba, said that Wright’s use of artificial intelligence led to many wrong data and the use of remote judicial precedents.
“This is a blatant warning to litigants,” Sherrill said, especially the risks of using obstetric intelligence tools to create court documents. “
