Opinion: Hart Lamor, co -founder of risk laboratories.
The decentralized financing, or Defi, was built on the ability to name, but the nomination is broken. New chains also multiply, liquidity fragments and incentives weaken.
One day, one common environment had been divided into dozens of silent markets. Defi Not dead, but without the infrastructure that connects these environments, you may lose what made them strong.
Broken liquidity has become the risk of Defi’s central expansion. Although the expansion of multiple chains was a natural response to the limits of the expansion of Ethereum, it created a new category of problems.
The infrastructure, not ideology, will determine whether the future of Multichain strengthens or weakens the category.
Divided liquidity is the primary failure of Defi
Defi protocols rely on integrated deep liquidity: a joint group of assets that can be borrowed, switched and class in strategies.
However, in a multi -tape world, this assumption is no longer. Liquidity is now spread across dozens of L1S, Rollups and Appchains. AAVE is published on 17 chains; Pendle on 11.
These publishing operations are strong on their own, but the liquidity they take is for the chain and is often accessible outside the environment where they are deposited.
this Turned It creates basic shortcomings: thinner markets, incentives, user and weakest and weaker marketing protocols. Even economic models with the best design begin to collapse when the liquidity that depends on it is no longer dense. The protocols that worked smoothly on Ethereum Mainnet are now struggling to provide the same results elsewhere – not because their models are defective, but because the context they work has changed.
The transformation into Multichain was necessary to expand. But without a way to simulate the ability to authorship across the chains, it risk undermining the foundations of Defi’s success.
Ux Multichain is not the root problem
Multichain Defi has focused on UX friction: portfolio switching, acquiring the distinctive gas and jumping symbols through the bridge user interface (user interfaces). These are symptoms on the surface level of a deeper problem: the lack of a unified implementation layer.
Users who try to implement even basic Crosschain The procedures often face inconsistent interfaces, fragmented prices and unconfirmed results. In recent months, some progress has been made with swap and bridge, but liquidity fragmentation and continuous efficiency.
Most of these systems depend on the isolated liquidity pools for each chain, with duplicate incentives and limited guidance paths. Even if the front end is uniform, the back front remains fragmented-the capital is ineffective and difficult to compose.
If liquidity can not move easily across the chains or requires bridges, wrapping, or interacting with multiple applications, Defi will not be able to be useful. The solution mimics synchronization, so users do not have to.
Related to: Blockchain Kataana is launched backed by Mugda
Blockchains is not designed to work in synchronization. There is no original way to carry out one atomic procedure across the chains. We do not need to wait for the synchronous infrastructure. We can simulate it.
This is where the solutions come. The solvents are developed representatives who use their capital and logic to join the segmented procedures on behalf of the user. The user simply expresses the intention – swap, deposit, interaction – and Solver is implemented across the chains to achieve, and strip the complexity under it.
The infrastructure -based infrastructure for the inter -operation is replaced, not monotheism
The intentions are more than just an abstract layer: it turns how liquidity design and the ability to connect and implement.
Erc-7683 Standardize how to express and achieve these intersecting intentions. It provides invisible bridges: one click or deposits or reactions that move across the chains without the user need to manage the complexity-even between ecosystems that were not designed for interaction.
The user on Solana can switch a cellar on the definition. Liquidity can move from and outside BNB seriesHistorically, historically from the original ethereum standards. The strategies become mobile. The protocols become operational.
The result is not perfect, but something more flexible: the systems that work together despite their differences.
Instead of forcing each series to adopt the same standards, the intended users allow users to determine the results while analysts are implemented via ecosystems – maintaining local strengths while enabling global liquidity. They do not erase the multiple complexity. They direct those around him.
Multichain is no longer theoretically. It is the environment in which Defi works today. Unless we solve the cost in the infrastructure layer, the DEFI range may not be expanded with it.
The danger is not a dramatic breakdown. It is slow erosion: insomnia liquidity, weaker incentives and less things that work across chains.
The infrastructure of the exit solutions – not by imposing monotheism but by simulating the experience of synchronization across the fragmented chains. This is how we maintain what DEFI made it strong in the first place and how we open what comes after that.
Opinion: Hart Lamor, co -founder of risk laboratories.
This article is intended for general information purposes and does not aim to be and should not be considered legal or investment advice. The opinions, ideas and opinions expressed here are alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.
