This article discusses the challenges of determining what is qualified as the decentralized material infrastructure network (DePin) and preachers of a flexible and comprehensive classification. It draws similarities to other classification discussions, such as whether the pills are soup, and it says that solid definitions often fail to capture the true spirit of the concept. The author suggests that the focus must be on enhancing growth and value in the real world instead of imposing strict definitions, while emphasizing that totalitarianism is crucial to attracting investment, talents and public awareness at this early stage of the development of Debine.
Upgrade Professional To read this report
Promotion and access to 800+ reports, including: