Most DePIN projects barely even use blockchain: True or false?

DePin – abbreviation of decentralized material infrastructure – is one of the most important new novels in encryption. However, the extent of current DePin projects actually depends on Blockchain networks is an open question.

It is called “IOS) with the development of Blockchain”, linking DePin projects and managing physical devices that collect and exchange data, such as wireless networks, power networks or storage systems.

These networks produce huge amounts of data, so Depin connectivity through Blockchain requires highly productive chains-and until then, Blockchains can only be recorded a small component of data.

Helium, one of the most famous DEPIN projects that link wireless networks, cleared its own series to move to Solana in April 2023, which is one of the fastest options currently available. However, even Solana’s efficiency falls short for DePin projects that require actual time account capabilities.

Are DePin projects really onchain?

“The current Depin use cases are, not the entire Onchain,” says Shweao Kong, co -founder of the Megaith magazine who will soon hope. Ethereum L2 aims to process 100,000 transactions per second that may be sufficient for some DePin projects.

Are DePin projects only classifying themselves as “Blockchain” as a marketing trick to attract investment capital owners?

Some may be. But the biggest issue is that the Depin Onchain applications at the present time are ineffective and expensive. Therefore, projects use a hybrid structure, and to perform the confessions of approval on the burner and record it.

Kong He said On the newly podcast, one of the co -founder of SolaNa is close to tracking fitness that needs biometric data accounts in actual time, which Solana cannot do. Kong claims that the upcoming Ethereum L2 Megaeth will have this ability.

Why Deeb Projects depend on offchain account

Zhe Wang, CEO of Dephy – a project that blocks DePin DePin data to Blockchains – The Internet of Things In two main categories: sensors and perpetrators.

The sensors collect data from physical environments and do not necessarily require immediate messages. Think about weather sensors or step -free networks.

The access time for sensors is more tolerant than the Wang port, which are driving devices.

The delay in the port’s calculations can cause such needed to drive or control the lights, discomfort or even danger.

“It will be very bad if you ask to extinguish the lights in your bedroom [and] “It is delivered in 10 minutes,” Wang says, “But if the number of your steps is calculated in one day, there is nothing wrong.”

Although sensor data can be transferred more easily, it is still not perfect, because continuous or wide -ranging data can become expensive and ineffective.

Why use bLockchain for DePin?

So, if both sensors and perpetrators data is more sensitive from abroad, what is the purpose that Blockchain serves to DePin?

“DePin Blockchains projects are used because it is a way to coordinate thousands of thousands if not millions of devices, in a way that does not require each device to trust each other,” says Wes Levitt, head of the Theta Labs.

Although the account is often required for the use of DePin, it is usually dealt with separately from what is recorded.

As the name suggests, DePin aims to place decentralization in the physical infrastructure, which requires participants to host devices, provide the frequency range or share data. But despite its advantages, Blockchain is not actually required to operate the decentralized infrastructure. Tor, an axiomatic alternative internet with thousands of nodes around the world, is one of the most famous examples.

Tor works thanks to the volunteers motivated by common interests, such as defending privacy and artistic experimentation.

Blockchain adds a financial incentive layer to participate through the shareholders’ reward with the symbols.

For example, DePin markets such as Cudos and Akash direct users to contribute to computing power, including graphics processing units, which can be rented for artificial intelligence services or other highly requested tasks. This allows the shareholders to win the symbols in exchange for the participation of their resources, and to create a more economically sustainable system

“This is what is being done on the Theta Edgeloud platform and many other Deepan projects,” Levitte says. Edgecloud nodes usually deal with AI processing or video offering tasks, which can take the contract anywhere from a few minutes to several hours to complete it.

Levitte argues that there is no value in sending partially completed jobs on Onchain every few seconds. Instead, the contract only needs to provide evidence of verification and payment.

“In most cases, it is sufficient to send the contract to prove work or coverage regularly over a certain period of time, perhaps with some guarantee to ensure compliance between the challenges,” he says.

The best and worst Blockchain networks for DePin projects

ETHEREUM is the largest Blockchain that can deal with DePin, but L1 is completely inappropriate because of the slow TPS. Layer 2, such as base and definition, can deal with more transactions, but this number is still in hundreds of a second at best.

But the year 2025 can be the year in which Blockchains takes its greatest steps to scaling so far.

MEGAETH – Short for “Make Ethereum Wonderful again” – is a Vitalik Buterin This uses an improved sequence device to provide expansion as it maintains Ethereum safety. While it is 100,000 TPS, it has not yet been released.

Sui, which is based on the Facebook transmission language, recently I entered the competitionWhen calling for a maximum of 300,000 transactions per second-exceeding even efficiency in actual time.

However, in October, only The highest average averageIt was TPS 822, with a decrease in 106 TPS on October 16. (However, TPS depends on demand as well as ability, and TPS in the real world is much lower than Testnet.)

Solana is still one of the fastest sets of classes -1, a maximum of 65000 TPS, but it is usually average about 3000 TPS, According to Solskan. The next Fredancer agent, currently in Testnet, is aimed at a million TPS.

But Wang argues that even this impressive productivity will not be sufficient to deal with the DePin project to work entirely on Blockchain.

He says that even Blockchain that works for a million TPS is still enough to deal with the huge amount of the power of the DePin requires.

WiFi map has more than 14 million devices, according to DePin examination. This means even if the device sends one message every 10 seconds (which is a very generous example of the examples of the Internet of Things account in the actual time), Blockchain will need 1.4 million transactions per second for this individual project.

At 1.4 million transactions per second and $ 0.024 gas fees per transaction (typically Solana), the project will be $ 33,600 per second.

“I don’t fully expect the Onchain DePin projects to become the base in the near future. Jeremy Frank, head of engineering in the Autonomys network, a project of storage a distributor supported by Blockchain and AI, says,“ computer requirements in actual time and the productivity of the huge data required by many DePin applications, simply outperform what can be dealt with with structures with structures Blockchain in full.

“However, I expect to see a growing part of the DePin function moves on Onchain over time with the improvement of expansion.”

DEPIN future: Blockchains and specialized structure

Currently, any Blockchain cannot support real transactions in the actual time for DePin projects, claiming Wang.

But the actual time account may not be necessary for all DePin applications, and it is not important that these projects link themselves with “Blockchain” as a marketing trick to attract investment capital owners.

DePin projects are often divided into architectural engineering between the components of ONChaIN and Offchain to improve expansion and performance, while ONSAIN components provide unreliable incentives and frown.

In the end, while DePin pushes Blockchain technology, its success is likely to find a balance between ONSAIN and Offchain operations.

Frank believes that future DePin projects will develop towards a more unit and specialized structure that can deal with the various mathematical needs of different applications.

“We will likely see the improved implementation environments for the specific vertical sectors, whether it is a biometric processing in actual time, widespread data, or high -frequency sensors.”