It is called Internet of Things (IOT) with the development of Blockchain, the connection of DePin projects and the management of physical devices that collect and exchange data, such as wireless networks, power networks or storage systems.
Helium, one of the most famous DEPIN projects that link wireless networks, cleared its own series to move to Solana in April 2023, which is one of the fastest options currently available. However, even Solanas efficiency is limited to projects that require actual time account capabilities.
Join us in the presentation of the cryptocurrency revolution, one news message at the same time. Subscribe now to get daily news and updates in the market directly in your in inventive box, along with millions of other subscribers (this is true, millions love us!) – What are you waiting for?
Are DePin projects really onchain?
In fact, current DePin use is not completely onchain, Shuyao Kong, co -founder of the Megaeth magazine that soon launch, told Magazine magazine soon. Ethereum L2 aims to process 100,000 transactions per second that may be sufficient for some DePin projects.
Are DePin projects only classifying themselves with Blockchain as a marketing trick to attract investment capital?
Some may be. But the biggest issue is that the Depin Onchain applications at the present time are ineffective and expensive. Therefore, projects use a hybrid structure, and to perform the confessions of approval on the burner and record it.
Why Deeb Projects depend on offchain account
The sensors collect data from physical environments and do not necessarily require immediate messages. Think about weather sensors or step -free networks.
The access time for sensors is more tolerant than the Wang port, which are driving devices.
The delay in the port’s calculations can cause such needed to drive or control the lights, discomfort or even danger.
It will be very bad if you ask to extinguish the lights in your bedroom [and] It is delivered in 10 minutes, Wang tells a magazine, but if the step number is calculated in one day, this is good.
Although sensor data can be transferred more easily, it is still not perfect, because continuous or wide -ranging data can become expensive and ineffective.
Why use bLockchain for DePin?
So, if both sensors and perpetrators data is more sensitive from abroad, what is the purpose that Blockchain serves to DePin?
DePin Blockchains projects are used because they are a way to coordinate thousands of thousands if not millions of devices, in a way that does not require each of the devices to trust each other, says Wes Levitte, the head of the strategy at Theet Labs, for Theeta Labs.
While the account is often required for the use of DePin, it is dealt with separately separately from what is recorded onchain.
As the name suggests, DePin aims to place decentralization in the physical infrastructure, which requires participants to host devices, provide the frequency range or share data. But despite its advantages, Blockchain is not actually required to operate the decentralized infrastructure. Tor, an axiomatic alternative internet with thousands of nodes around the world, is one of the most famous examples.
Tor works thanks to the volunteers motivated by common interests, such as defending privacy and artistic experimentation.
Read also
Blockchain adds a financial incentive layer to participate through the shareholders’ reward with the symbols.
For example, DePin markets such as Cudos and Akash direct users to contribute to computing power, including graphics processing units, which can be rented for artificial intelligence services or other highly requested tasks. This allows the shareholders to win the symbols in exchange for the participation of their resources, and to create a more economically sustainable system
This is what is done on our TETA EDGECLOUD platform and many other DePin projects, Levitt says. Edgecloud nodes usually deal with AI processing or video offering tasks, which can take the contract anywhere from a few minutes to several hours to complete it.
Levitte argues that there is no value in sending partially completed jobs on Onchain every few seconds. Instead, the contract only needs to provide evidence of verification and payment.
In most cases, it is sufficient to send the contract to proof or cover regularly over a certain period of time, perhaps with some guarantee to ensure compliance between the challenges, he says.
The best and worst Blockchain networks for DePin projects
ETHEREUM is the largest Blockchain that can deal with DePin, but L1 is completely inappropriate because of the slow TPS. Layer 2, such as base and definition, can deal with more transactions, but this number is still in hundreds of a second at best.
But the year 2025 can be the year in which Blockchains takes its greatest steps to scaling so far.
Read also
However, in October, Suez The highest average averageIt was TPS 822, with a decrease in 106 TPS on October 16. (However, TPS depends on demand as well as ability, and TPS in the real world is much lower than Testnet.)
But Wang argues that even this impressive productivity will not be sufficient to deal with the DePin project to work entirely on Blockchain.
He says that even Blockchain that works for a million TPS is still enough to deal with the huge amount of the power of the DePin requires.
At 1.4 million transactions per second and $ 0.024 gas fees per transaction (model Solanas), the project will be $ 33,600 per second.
I do not fully expect on ONSAIN DePin projects to become the base in the near future. The actual time demands and the productivity of the huge data required by many DePin applications are simply dealing with what you can deal with the entirely current Blockchain Blockchain, Jermy Frank, and the head of engineering at Autonomys Network, a project of storage a distributor supported by Blockchain and AI.
However, I expect it to see a growing part of the Depin function that moves onchain over time with the improvement of expansion.
Read also
DEPIN future: Blockchains and specialized structure
Currently, any Blockchain cannot support real transactions in the actual time for DePin projects, claiming Wang.
But the actual time account may not be necessary for all DePin applications, and it is not the case these projects that link themselves with Blockchain as a marketing trick to attract investment capital owners.
DePin projects are often divided into architectural engineering between the components of ONChaIN and Offchain to improve expansion and performance, while ONSAIN components provide unreliable incentives and frown.
In the end, while DePin pushes Blockchain technology, its success is likely to find a balance between ONSAIN and Offchain operations.
Frank believes that future DePin projects will develop towards a more unit and specialized structure that can deal with the various mathematical needs of different applications.
We will probably see the implementation environments designed for this purpose are improved for the specific vertical sectors, whether in actual time biometric processing, widespread data storage, or high -frequency sensors networks.
Subscribe
The most attractive readings in Blockchain. It was delivered once a week.
