They are distinguished by the revenue -based model of DePin projects from traditional speculative symbols by focusing on generating revenues through customer -based traditional business models. This approach guarantees the ability of the project beyond the encryption space, providing a more successful path. Tom Tropridge, co -founder of Fluence and the Bodcast References, argues that DePin projects aim to generate revenues through “customer -based traditional business models”, which contradict the speculative nature of Meme currencies. The generation of revenue is very important because it provides a stable basis for the project, making it less dependent on the volatile encryption market.
For example, DePin projects use distinctive symbols to compensate for service providers, and these symbols can be estimated with network scales. This is similar to companies like Uber and AirbnbBut with a developed development. TROWBRIDGE highlights that “DePins on the threshold of generating large revenues from paying customers who, when associated with the convincing symbolic economy that pays value to symbols, will attract the investor’s attention to this sector from encryption.” This revenue model not only guarantees the sustainability of the project, but also attracts a new wave of institutional investors and retail interested in traction and a set of clear expectations that the economics of the distinctive symbol brings.
Moreover, the purchase mechanism and burns used by DePin projects distinguish them from speculative symbols. This strategy includes the use of part of the project’s revenues to buy and burn its original symbols, creating a strong analogy. “DePin revenues are not related to the encryption market, and DePin is the only decentralized encryption sector that is widespread in purchase/burning. The potential impact on symbols with revenue scales will come independent of the dynamics of the encryption market, and the dynamics of purchase/burning become strong.” This mechanism has the ability to separate DePin projects from the broader encryption market, making it more flexible in market fluctuations and increasing the remaining icons over time.
The effects of this revenue -based model for long -term feasibility and the interest of the investor are great. Traditional stock investors, who are historically unable to assess previous generations of symbolic projects, will be interested in DePin projects due to the generation of clear economic revenues and models. This shift draws more attention to the economics of the distinctive symbol, adding a layer of audit and may attract more institutional and retail investors. TROWBRIDGE also concludes, “2025 will bring dozens of DePin projects with a number of new symbolic models, and we look forward to seeing the space in development.” This development is likely to be driven by the revenue -based model, which provides a stable and predictable path to success for DePin projects.
In conclusion, DePin projects are a big step forward in the world of cryptocurrencies. By focusing on models that depend on revenue and implementation mechanisms such as purchase and burning, DePin projects provide more stable and predictable investment opportunity. This approach not only guarantees the sustainability of the project, but also attracts a new wave of institutional investors and retail trade, which attracts more attention to the economics of the distinctive symbol and adding a layer of scrutiny. As the encryption scene continues to develop, DePin projects are preparing to take the main current by the storm, providing a new model of decentralized financing based on stability and ability to predict.
